Reframing the Debate over BRICS Beyond its Conceptual Origins
نویسندگان
چکیده
BRICS has commonly been framed through a strictly economic perspective, with focus on the growth patterns of individual members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Viewed in this fashion, grouping is judged negative manner, sense disappointment frustration. Yet, wider diplomatic context, image quite different, an accent several features that cast more positive interpretation. BRICS: A Very Short Introduction highlighted these 2016. And, notwithstanding some unanticipated developments exaggerated differences—and tensions— between members BRICS, it staying power pattern evolution creative fashion club stands out. Although overshadowed by other multilateral institutions, achievements New Development Bank (NDB) should not be downplayed. Moreover, developed problem (or even crisis) management techniques. As informal institutions club-like attributes, tensions were dealt avoiding issues divided members. Over time, though, template complemented active forms problem-solving relating to internal differences.
منابع مشابه
Reframing the debate over assisted colonization
© The Ecological Society of America www.frontiersinecology.org C change is poised to dramatically alter ecosystems and reshuffle ecological communities. The geological record reveals that, as climates changed in the distant past, some species moved great distances, retreating into pockets of suitable climate or expanding their range to fill newly forming niches. However, when we look to the fut...
متن کاملThe American midwife debate. A sourcebook on its modern origins
E. H. Ackerknecht, arguing that a history of therapeutics would be "the most useful book a medical historian could write", apologized in the preface to his own work on the subject (1970; English translation, Therapeutics from the primitives to the twentieth century, London, Collier Macmillan, 1973) that, owing to ill health, he had to limit himself to an outline of therapeutic principles in int...
متن کاملInterventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment
Actuarial risk assessments might be unduly perceived as a neutral way to counteract implicit bias and increase the fairness of decisions made at almost every juncture of the criminal justice system, from pretrial release to sentencing, parole and probation. In recent times these assessments have come under increased scrutiny, as critics claim that the statistical techniques underlying them migh...
متن کاملReframing the disease debate and defending the biostatistical theory.
Similarly to other accounts of disease, Christopher Boorse's Biostatistical Theory (BST) is generally presented and considered as conceptual analysis, that is, as making claims about the meaning of currently used concepts. But conceptual analysis has been convincingly critiqued as relying on problematic assumptions about the existence, meaning, and use of concepts. Because of these problems, ac...
متن کاملReframing the Student Loan Costing Debate The Benefits of Competition
(EPI) is a non-profit, non-partisan, and non-governmental organization dedicated to policy-based research on educational opportunity for all students. With offices in Washington, DC, Toronto, Ontario, and Melbourne, Australia, EPI is a collective association of researchers and policy analysts from around the world dedicated to the mission of enhancing our knowledge of critical barriers facing s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Organisations Research Journal
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1996-7845', '2542-2081']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-02